Skinfold Body Fat Calculator

Estimate body fat percentage with sex-specific Jackson-Pollock three-site skinfold equations.

Three-site skinfold assessment
Enter age and caliper measurements in millimeters.

About skinfold body fat estimates

Skinfold assessment estimates body composition from the thickness of pinched skin and subcutaneous fat at standardized anatomical sites. A trained tester uses calipers to apply consistent pressure, records measurements in millimeters, and enters the site total into a population-derived equation. This calculator implements the Jackson-Pollock three-site equations, which first estimate body density and then use the Siri equation to convert density into body fat percentage. The male equation uses chest, abdomen, and thigh measurements. The female equation uses triceps, suprailiac, and thigh measurements. Both equations also include age. After the three measurements are summed, sex-specific coefficients estimate body density; body fat is then calculated as 495 divided by density minus 450. These labels describe the original equation groups and are not a statement about gender identity. Choose the equation whose reference population and measurement sites are appropriate for the person being assessed. Technique is the largest practical source of error. Identify each landmark carefully, grasp a double fold of skin and fat without underlying muscle, place the caliper about one centimeter from the fingers, and wait briefly before reading. Take at least two measurements at each site, rotating through sites rather than repeating one immediately. If readings differ substantially, repeat them and use a consistent protocol. Measure on the same side of the body and under similar hydration, exercise, and time-of-day conditions when tracking change. A skinfold result is an estimate, not a direct measurement of total body fat. Equations perform best in populations similar to the samples used to develop them and can be less accurate at the extremes of age, muscularity, or adiposity. Different methods, including seven-site equations, bioelectrical impedance, air displacement, and DXA, should not be expected to give identical values. For progress tracking, consistency of tester, caliper, sites, and equation is usually more useful than comparing isolated results from different methods. Do not use this output to diagnose a health condition or prescribe nutrition. Discuss body-composition concerns with a qualified health or fitness professional.

Skinfold calculation examples

MeasurementsEstimated body fatEquation
Male, age 30; chest 10, abdomen 20, thigh 15 mm13.6%Jackson-Pollock male three-site.
Female, age 30; triceps 15, suprailiac 12, thigh 20 mm19.8%Jackson-Pollock female three-site.
Male, age 40; chest 15, abdomen 25, thigh 20 mm18.1%A larger site sum produces a lower estimated density.

How to estimate body fat from skinfolds

  1. Choose the sex-specific Jackson-Pollock equation.
  2. Enter age and measure each displayed anatomical site with a skinfold caliper.
  3. Record each measurement in millimeters and repeat inconsistent readings.
  4. Select Calculate Body Fat to estimate body density and body fat percentage.
  5. Track change using the same tester, sites, caliper, and conditions.

Frequently asked questions

How accurate is a skinfold body fat estimate?

Accuracy depends on tester skill, caliper quality, site identification, and how well the equation fits the person. Consistent technique makes the method more useful for tracking trends.

Why are different sites used for male and female equations?

The original Jackson-Pollock studies derived separate regressions from sex-specific samples and selected sites that best predicted density in those groups. The formulas therefore are not interchangeable.

Should I average repeated measurements?

Take at least two readings per site and repeat them when they differ beyond your protocol’s tolerance. Use the protocol’s accepted average rather than selecting the most favorable reading.

Why does age affect the calculation?

The regression includes age because the relationship between subcutaneous fat, total fat, and body density changes across adulthood. Age is part of the validated equation rather than a separate judgment.

Can I compare this result with a smart scale?

You can observe broad trends, but the values may differ because each method uses different assumptions. For reliable tracking, compare results produced by the same method under similar conditions.