Bertrand's Paradox Calculator

Calculate the classic box paradox probability and its expected outcome over repeated trials.

Conditional Trial Calculator
Model the classic three-box experiment after the first drawn coin is known to be gold.

A conditional trial is one in which the first observed coin was gold.

Understanding Bertrand's Paradox

This version of Bertrand's paradox is the famous three-box conditional probability problem, also called Bertrand's box paradox. Three visually identical boxes contain different pairs of coins: two gold coins in the first, one gold and one silver coin in the second, and two silver coins in the third. A box is selected at random and one coin is drawn at random. Once the drawn coin is observed to be gold, the problem asks how likely it is that the coin remaining in that box is gold too. It is tempting to discard the Silver-Silver box and treat the other two boxes as equally likely, giving an answer of one-half. That reasoning overlooks the likelihood of the evidence. The Gold-Gold box can reveal gold in two distinct ways, while the Gold-Silver box can reveal gold in only one way. Conditioned on seeing gold, there are three equally likely gold-producing positions. Two positions come from the Gold-Gold box, so the exact probability of another gold coin is 2/3, approximately 66.67%. The calculator applies this exact theoretical probability to a chosen number of conditional trials. Multiplying the trial count by 2/3 gives the expected number of trials in which the unseen coin is gold. Because an expected value can be fractional while an observed count must be whole, the display rounds to the nearest whole outcome. It does not generate random samples, so repeated calculations remain deterministic. A real Monte Carlo simulation would fluctuate around this expectation and generally move closer to a two-thirds proportion as its trial count grows. The paradox teaches a broad lesson about conditional probability: possible explanations should be weighted by how readily each explanation produces the observation. This principle underlies Bayes' theorem and appears in diagnostic testing, screening, reliability analysis, and classification. The setup also requires clear sampling assumptions. Each box must have an equal initial chance of selection, and either coin in a selected box must have an equal chance of being drawn. Different selection weights would change the answer. Enter several trial counts to distinguish the fixed theoretical probability from the changing expected count, and remember that actual experimental totals can differ from expectation through random variation.

Expected Outcome Examples

The probability stays at two-thirds while the expected count scales with trials.

Conditional TrialsExpected Gold Second CoinsCalculation
302030 multiplied by 2/3 equals 20.
300200The expected proportion remains 66.67%.
1,5001,000A larger experiment still uses the same conditional probability.

How to Calculate the Expected Outcome

  1. Choose how many trials have already produced a gold first coin.
  2. Enter that positive whole number in the trial field.
  3. Select Calculate Expected Outcome to apply the exact two-thirds probability.
  4. Compare the fixed probability with the expected number of gold second coins.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is this the chord version of Bertrand's paradox?

No, this calculator covers Bertrand's three-box coin paradox and conditional probability. The random-chord paradox is a different problem that depends on how a random chord is defined.

Why is the probability always two-thirds?

The classic box contents and equal sampling assumptions are fixed. Of the three possible gold-producing coin positions, two have another gold coin beside them.

Are expected outcomes guaranteed?

No, an expected count is a long-run average rather than a guaranteed experimental total. Random samples may land above or below it.

Why does the calculator use conditional trials?

The paradox asks about trials where gold has already been observed, so unrelated silver observations are excluded. Conditioning on that evidence is what changes the box probabilities.

How would biased box selection change the answer?

Each box's prior selection probability would need to multiply its chance of producing gold. The simple two-thirds result applies only when all boxes and coin positions are sampled uniformly.