Radar Horizon Calculator
Calculate geometric and refracted radar line-of-sight distance from antenna and target heights.
About the Radar Horizon
Radar Horizon Examples
Effective distances use the standard four-thirds-Earth approximation.
| Radar and target heights | Geometric / effective | Scenario |
|---|---|---|
| 20 m radar, 5 m target | 23.95 / 27.65 km | Low coastal installation |
| 100 m radar, 10 m target | 46.98 / 54.25 km | Tower observing a vessel |
| 30 m radar, 1,000 m target | 132.42 / 152.91 km | Ground radar observing an aircraft |
How to Calculate Radar Horizon
- Measure radar antenna height above the local terrain or water surface.
- Enter the target's height above that same effective surface.
- Use 1.333333 for a standard atmosphere or enter a justified local k factor.
- Calculate and compare the geometric and effective line-of-sight distances.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the difference between geometric and radar horizon?
The geometric horizon assumes a straight ray over a spherical Earth. The effective radar horizon accounts for atmospheric bending through the selected k factor and is usually farther under standard conditions.
Why is four-thirds Earth commonly used?
A k factor of four-thirds approximates typical downward bending in a standard atmosphere. It is a planning convention, not a constant atmospheric law.
Does a target at zero height have a horizon?
Its own horizon contribution is zero in this smooth-surface model, but the elevated radar still contributes distance. Terrain, waves, and obstructions can prevent a truly surface-level target from being visible at that limit.
Does this calculate actual radar detection range?
No, it calculates a curvature-limited line-of-sight distance. Detection also depends on power, frequency, antenna gain, losses, target radar cross section, clutter, and receiver performance.
Can atmospheric ducting increase the range?
Yes, strong refractivity gradients can trap energy and extend propagation well beyond the standard horizon. Ducting is variable and requires more detailed weather and propagation analysis.