Projectile Motion Experiment Calculator
Predict velocity components, range, maximum height, and flight time for a level-ground projectile motion experiment.
About projectile motion experiments
Projectile experiment examples
Predictions for common launch settings provide reference values for a laboratory data table.
| Experiment settings | Ideal prediction | Lab interpretation |
|---|---|---|
| 20 m/s at 45°, g 9.80665 m/s² | Time 2.8842 s; range 40.7886 m; height 10.1972 m | The horizontal and vertical launch components are both 14.1421 m/s. |
| 10 m/s at 30°, g 10 m/s² | Time 1 s; range 8.6603 m; height 1.25 m | Rounded gravity creates convenient values for a classroom demonstration. |
| 10 m/s at 60°, g 10 m/s² | Time 1.7321 s; range 8.6603 m; height 3.75 m | The complementary 30 and 60 degree launches have equal ideal range but different arcs. |
How to plan a projectile experiment
- Measure or set the initial speed and launch angle relative to a level horizontal reference.
- Confirm that the release point and landing surface have the same elevation.
- Enter the speed, angle, and applicable gravitational acceleration in the labeled fields.
- Select Calculate Experiment and record the ideal predictions before collecting repeated observations.
- Compare measured means with the prediction while reporting uncertainty and likely sources of error.
Projectile experiment FAQ
Why must launch and landing heights be equal?
The experiment calculator uses the symmetric flight-time formula 2vy / g. Different elevations require solving the full vertical position equation instead.
How can initial velocity be measured?
Photogates can divide a known spacing by transit time, and calibrated video can fit position over successive frames. Repeated measurements help quantify random variation.
Why do complementary angles have the same ideal range?
For level-ground motion, range is proportional to sin 2θ. Complementary angles produce the same sine value, although the steeper launch reaches greater height and remains airborne longer.
How should measured and predicted range be compared?
Use the mean of repeated measured ranges and report percent difference alongside uncertainty. A difference smaller than the measurement uncertainty may not represent a meaningful model failure.
What causes experimental results to differ from theory?
Air drag, spin, launcher variation, inaccurate angle alignment, timing delay, and unequal elevations are common causes. Systematic errors should be investigated rather than hidden by averaging.